Showing posts with label filmmaking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label filmmaking. Show all posts

Sunday, January 16, 2011

jarmusch rules (abbrv.)

Photo via jonathanrosenbaum.com

Rule #1: There are no rules.
Rule #2: Don’t let the fuckers get ya.
Rule #3: The production is there to serve the film.
Rule #4: Filmmaking is a collaborative process.

Rule #5: Nothing is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is nonexistent. And don’t bother concealing your thievery—celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: “It’s not where you take things from—it’s where you take them to.”

Posting these so I don't lose track of them. They're intended for filmmakers but apply across the board. Treat yourself and read them in their entirety.

Found via users illusions.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

cut with your gut

Video: Dog Day Afternoon Trailer
(film editing for Dog Day Afternoon earned
Dede Allen an Oscar Nomination in 1976)

Miss Allen, though she read Eisenstein on a Los Angeles streetcar, is not a theorizer and will generalize only to the extent of suggesting that film editing is both a talent and a craft. She talks in terms of specific films and specific personalities.

Robert Wise, whose “Odds Against Tomorrow” was her first major assignment, she credits with having given her confidence to experiment, to work with her own interpretations of a scene. She remembers once reversing an optical so that, in the Wise film, Gloria Grahame, instead of lowering her eyes in a doorway flirtation with Robert Ryan, raised them to give a quite different meaning to the scene.

She recalls Wise saying delightedly: “It is different working with a woman!” To which Miss Allen answered: “I should hope so.”


From Vincent Canby’s 1972 New York Times piece: Dede Is A Lady Editor.

Esteemed film editor Dede Allen passed away on Saturday.

It’s a trip reading Canby’s 1972 piece on her and her work in which the overwhelming observation seems to be: My god! Look! A lady! Editing film!

Yes: She did.


Craig McKay spoke to her influence on his work yesterday on NPR:

I can remember one of the first things she ever said to me. She says, you have to cut with your gut. And what that meant, I came to discover over the years, was that this process is not really so much a thinking process as it is an intuitive process. She was an intuitive editor. And I think she passed that along to me, along with so many other great editors that she's single-handedly responsible for creating.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

venous rising


...channeling.
Originally uploaded by underbunny.


I like it to be fairly red and dark and not too bright.


Director David Cronenberg speaking of blood with Terry Gross, during today's Fresh Air broadcast.

Cronenberg's preference is for venous blood, not so oxygenated, and not so bright.

In case you're wondering.

His film, Eastern Promises, opens this weekend »

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

more on death


Q. In a world without film, what would you have made?

A. Film.


Italian Film Director Michaelangelo Antonioni in an undated interview, as reported in his obituary in today's New York Times.

Also on Antonioni: A Chronicler of Alienated Europeans in a Flimsy New World »

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

spells & subterfuge



The trouble with seeing a whole bunch of movies all at once is that you start to see similarities between them where none may actually exist.

Take the summer blockbuster Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and the quietly controlled German film The Lives of Others (Das Leben der Anderen).

Bear with me.

The Lives of Others picked up a fresh head of steam when it landed an Academy Award, and is currently making another tour of the art houses in the U.S.; Harry Potter, of course, is playing everywhere, all the time.

In each film the protagonists’ beloved home (Hogsworth, the GDR) has taken on a grey pall under the controlling machinations of the acting administrator – Imelda Staunton's polished rose-colored Dolores Umbridge in Harry Potter, and the massively, powerfully grunting presence of Thomas Thieme as Minister Bruno Hempf in The Lives of Others.

Our hero in each (Daniel Radcliffe as Harry; Sebastian Koch as Georg Dreyman), chiseled of jaw and sporting the black rimmed glasses that serve as the universal signifier for “smarter than the average bear”, pursues secret means by which to act against an oppressive state – Harry by holing up and teaching wizardry to his classmates in a hidden chamber; Dreyman by using a contraband red-inked Olivetti that he hides under a doorsill so that he cannot be connected to an essay, critical of the GDR, published pseudonymously in Der Spiegel.




The lovely ingénue in each of the films (Katie Leung as Cho Chang; Martina Gedeck as Christa-Maria Sieland) after captivating the glandular attention of our hero, is pressed into an impossible situation which leads to her to betray those most dear to hear.

But the comparison that struck me, and led me down this ridiculous path of mapping characters and events across two impossibly different films, was the intervention at the end – the intercession of the actor compassionate to the cause, who endangers his own life to save the lives of those he loves.

Not so remarkable in Harry Potter, where it’s expected – grizzled old wizards, after all, are expected to pull out their wands and toss lightening bands around to assist those under their tutelage.

It was in The Lives of Others that the quiet act of defiance by the Stasi Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler (played to perfection by Ulrich Mühe, who regrettably passed away just recently from cancer at 54) made such a lasting impression.

Slowly he comes to love the playwright and the actress whom he secretly monitors, while sequestered away in their attic, tapped into the wires that run through each wall of their home – loves the way they love each other, loves the conviction and purpose with which they pursue their art – almost as much as he despises the motives of the truculent Hempf who wants them monitored for his own selfish advantage – until finally Wiesler finds himself acting in defiance of the State that he has invested his professional life to defend through surveillance and subterfuge.

A stretch, maybe, to compare these two together – but it’s the theme at the core common to each that captivated me – the willingness to adopt hidden means by which to overcome an oppressive State that imposes limits on the human spirit and our inalienable rights. To see two popular films – admittedly made or staged elsewhere, but blessed with box office here in the U.S. which is how we confer acceptance – gave me hope that folks are working up the courage to speak out against the phone tapping and the surveillance and the loss of personal freedoms that have come in the wake of the Bush Administration’s handling of 9/11.

After all, we don’t talk about it much – not to the extent that others elsewhere may be talking about the change that has come over us, and when we do bring it up it’s in left leaning channels where conversations like these are expected but largely ignored by those who don’t consider themselves left-leaning. But Harry Potter is mainstream, and The Lives of Others became so when it won an Academy Award and received wider distribution.

My naïve hope? That the larger America is finally fed up, and that something’s stirring.

At last.

Monday, July 30, 2007

a weird and very unpleasant dream



Goodnight, Mr. Bergman. And thank you.

Here's the London Times obit, in which it is revealed that Sondheim's A Little Night Music was inspired by Smiles of a Summer Night (maybe it wasn't such a secret, but it was news to me).

Video excerpt from Wild Strawberries »

(Just realized that today's theme is sex & death. Didn't plan it that way. Might have something to do with watching Nosferatu before I went to bed last night.)

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

mashing up the master



So last night I’m watching the documentary Brahkage, and hearing what the experimental filmmaker had to say about viewership – about shooting in 8mm and not 16 because it allows for better access to the work – allows folks to view it at home, live with it like they would a work of art, a painting on their wall.

And I’m wondering: What would Brahkage have thought of YouTube, and the access that it provides, if he’d lived long enough to see it?

A quick query provided the answer: He’d have to suffer through mashups of his work with random audio tracks like this one.

Not sure the master of visual rhythm – who called soundtracks “deadends” and left his films audio-free intentionally -- would be too keen on that.

But I’d love to hear him sound off about it. Just one more time.
Related Posts with Thumbnails